/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9905878

THIS is why I can't trust Climate Change cucks...your image looks like something actually generated with data and meticulous projections.

OP's map looks like it was created by a Photoshop neophyte who simply superimposed a fucking rectangle over the land masses and hit flood fill...then added some half-ass coloring around the edges of Africa and Australia to make it look "authentic".

>>9654985
>This incident confirms worries that the possibility of fully functioning sex robots raises both tantalising possibilities for human desire (by mirroring human/sex-worker relationships), as well as serious ethical questions.

No, it fucking doesn't, on either count.

I don't have to say "excuse me" to my Roomba, or apologize to my phone for dropping it. We don't give Predator drones medals for killing troublesome snackbars, either.

It's a piece of property and hardware, subject to no rights whatsoever. There is no machine at any cost that comes close to the sentience level of a human at this point, let alone a sex doll. And if you're going to worry about the rights of things that are human shaped, statues, mannequins, dildos and now fleshlights have had no rights going back for millennia.