/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10794074
I'm not saying that we should kill them, but just imagine the possible positive outcomes

>>10719784
Link to article ?
Might be an interesting read.

>>10626962
wow

>>10528136
>i’m sorry you don’t find it intuitive but that’s how the theory works and it has more empirical confirmation than any other theory, period

And I'm sorry you described everything a field does without explaining the cause of a field, shadow chaser.

It's like believing "Bob the human" turns into something completely different when he waves his hand at you. No he's still "Bob the human", he's only causing the action of "waving". Now tell me what "Bob the human" is please. "Bob the human is" is nice and all and it's great that we can count him and assign a number to him, but that doesn't tell me what "Bob the human" actually is.

>>10512898
The gender social construct is just another form of the "poor rich" paradigm that humans have NEVER ended. It's a product of pure materialism so as long as such humans exist then the cycle will continue. Retards will always believe they were "deprived" of something they never had, obviously because they want "more". It's only a question of "wants" rather than "needs".

>>10512902
Who do you think is getting the majority of transition surgeries?

>>10512917
>it won't, gender IS a social construct, now if you're talking about how people are being absolutely retarded about it then hopefully soon.
This is a redundant statement. The recognition of "genders" is inherently retarded from the standpoint that we're all human beings. Humans only have the illusion of a duality that we've dubbed "male" and "female" but it's not an actual duality of "human". Basically as long as we keep referring to ourselves as a "particularized" human based on such illogical reasons then that's what we'll be.

>>10512941
And both are "human".

>>10513770
>Retard who believes you can make something that has no basis in reality "obsolete"

>>10514096
>groupthink that agrees with me
Nice

>Prove it.
Prove that a human needs to change sex in order to be self-sufficient. If it takes away the self-sufficiency of the human then I would wager to say that it's pretty "degenerate" to the human.

>By definition, they do. An outlier existing at all disproves your claim that “you’re either male or female when you’re born.” Making bare assertions is really sad. :-)
All this proves is that gender/sex doesn't matter. So why would you overcomplicate/destroy what is not flawed? If you're a "human" that's what you are. Focusing on the duality drives you further from that.

>>10514105
Yes
>Can someone explain this retarded shit to me?
Materialism. "I want", "I don't have", "I was deprived of something I was absent of" type of "thinking". Jealousy too.

>>10202228
Either:
>Rocket surgery
or
>Brain science