/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9354357
>He has been giving the environmental factors which would directly cause psychological inclinations towards lower intelligence and violence.
I know nitwit, that's why I explicitly pointed how you cannot completely separate genes from environment, because it's fucking retarded. All organisms are is genes that are expressed in an environment. He's trying to push this radical black and white separation of the two when it's impossible.

>You've been insisting genetics contributes towards everything completely baselessly.
t. brainlet. Please convince me how your genes do not influence every aspect of your life. Please point to a single cell, any cell, inside your body who's function has not been influenced by DNA. The brain, eyes, and muscles you're using to type this absolutely idiotic post; ALL of it; can be traced back to information stored in DNA. Trying to act as if our environment is untouched by DNA is the true baseless claim.

>This is the only new thing you've brought to the table with no source and no evidence its another unfounded claim and studies have shown the exact opposite to be true.
>Attacks me for not posting studies, while simultaneously not posting any either to support your claim.
The studies are out there, I didn't post any because it's pain to have to dig up the information every time you people disagree with me(which is a lot). I'm not going to spoon feed you they're out there, here's a start:
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/why-ses-does-not-explain.pdf
http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
Also try reading the bell curve.

>You don't like black people or you aren't comfortable around black people or you need to feel superior or something.
Piss poor argument, dude; assuming just because I have controversial opinions they must be out of spite. I guess when James Watson suggested the same thing as I, it was because he was an "ebil wacist" that hate black people.