[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.16164215 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 1702610282647642.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16164215

>>16159660
>Seek help, you're ra—ACK!

>> No.16020872 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 1537523331030.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16020872

>>16012881
Since there are no genetic differences between races, any difference in outcome only pertains to the environment, the circumances enjoyed or scorned by respective races, then one would assume that outcomes, crime rate, etc. pertaining to race would be directly proportional to socio-economic status, no? However, this isn't the case at all. Even when we adjust for socio-economic status, the differences in criminality and IQ remain, barely varying. The truth is that we have no reason to believe that there was an equal evolutionary pressure towards intelligence across all facets of humanity. It's not only unlikely, but it's an utterly absurd assertion. I just don't believe it.

>> No.15466443 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 78302-20089.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15466443

>>15466390
Professor David Reich, a world leading geneticist from Harvard, disagrees with you.

But of course, you and all of academia know better dont you?

Oh, did I mention he is somewhere left of Marx?

>> No.14832376 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 1619072287035.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14832376

>> No.12600296 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 1610233895257.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12600296

>>12599599
even left leaning Harvard academics admit it in the fucking NYT

>> No.12498137 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, race genetics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12498137

>>12493363
You are, of course, 100% correct. This makes all the redditards/bunkercels seethe profoundly.
>>12494280
Just look at this unhinged response.

>> No.12383295 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, race genetics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12383295

>>12378523...

>> No.12357689 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 1604909325234.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12357689

>>12357649
True. But it does turn out different populations do have different iq's. The word 'unlikely' is not a proof.

Its just trying to get across- if you believe humans who evolved in completely different environments for 10s of thousands of years have the same IQ you better have some fucking good evidence up your sleeve or it just sounds like gigacope (same for any trait, not just iq but aggression, disease rates, empathy, conscientiousness/orderlyness...). But environmentalists NEVER prove people are the same, they just take cheap digs at hereditarians work and never propose any falsifiable claim. If they ever have, its always been false and the hereditarians have been proven right time and time again. So you better have something more up your sleeves than a literal iteration of 'hur dur find the genes' to be taken seriously in any academic context.

Pic related

>> No.12232518 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 1592182427788.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12232518

>>12229259
And they are all lying faggot shilling for money and publications

>> No.11799872 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 1592182427788.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11799872

>>11799845
>poor diets
>distrust of white institutions
>higher rates of problematic genes
>fetal alcohol syndrome
It's crazy that we've identified 20,000 species of bees, but we can't study ourselves freely and objectively

>> No.10450495 [View]
File: 194 KB, 1815x1039, 1552043945923.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10450495

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]