[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10060336 [View]
File: 8 KB, 209x241, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10060336

how do I show [math]A\subseteq \mathbb{R}[/math] is Lebesgue measurable if and only if [math]A+y[/math] is Lebesgue measurable, for [math]y\in \mathbb{R}[/math]. I know that the outer measure is translation invariant. For instance, [math]m(A+y) = m^{*}(A+y) = m^{*}(A)[/math], but I can't just conclude from this that [math]m(A)[/math] follows, right?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]