/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14493049
>Let’s imagine that all English literature, including many poems and short stories unknown to the public, are collected in a huge database, and that you want to look for an unknown poem which, however, you believe was important at a certain historical period. You don’t know anything about this poem, except that it is a love poem. You will therefore have to enter keywords in the computer that make you find the poem, but you can’t use more than 18 to 24 letters. So you type “my love I miss you”, a phrase of 18 characters, and with this phrase you should find your poem among the about 28 billion poems contained in the database, half of which love poems. What are the chances of bringing out the specific poem you are looking for and not one different from what interests you? We would say next to zero … and this is what happens with RT-PCR in relation to a presumed virus that is said to be new and is therefore unknown.

>Incidentally, SARS-CoV-2 was “pieced together” on the computer. The physician Thomas Cowan called this “scientific fraud.” He wrote on October 15, 2020: “This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC, published in June 2020. The article’s purpose was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.” In fact, the article section “Whole Genome Sequencing” shows that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”

[4/?]