/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12662175
>>still believes saturated fat is harmful for you
>greentext says "eat more saturated fat", not "eat saturated fat"
>implying I said that any saturated fat is bad

>type 3 civilization uses all the energy output of a galaxy

But why would they fucking bother doing that?

>>12640535
Hmmm, coof coof. . .
Doing big think. . .

>>12515419
>FUCKING CATTLE? FUCKING SHEEP

>>11636422
You know what they say, all toasters toast toast. Which is wrongby the way, because toasters toast bread.

Anyone else think this is far more reasonable than the standard model? I started to really question the SM after thinking about dark energy and dark matter and how nonsensical they were.

thunderbolts.info for more information on EUT

If particles inside neutron star can share the same 3D point because they have different momentum state, doesn't that make momentum states an extra dimension(s)? How many other properties have this property(locality?)?

so im in a reeducation program and we got the not rated additional task to solve y=a+abc for a

a+abc=y | out multiply a
a+(bc+1)=y |/(bc+1)
a=y/(bc+1)

what i dont understand is why outmultiplying a is a+(bc+1)
pls help

If you are trying to maximize efficiency for studying for long periods of times, is it better to stop and stretch for 5 min breaks every 30 mins or every hour, or every hour and a half?

>>10930658

>not an argument

Weird....I see a Premise and a Conclusion....

Wouldn't it be a constant battle to maintain the atmosphere and magnetic field? Excluding unforeseeable technology.

.

>>9893690
I am naturally afraid of the cosmos, largely due to its sheer size and all the unknowns surrounding it. It makes me feel better knowing the qualities the celestial bodies in our system possess. Not having a clear answer as to what the sun looks like gives me some anxiety.

>>9690698
>culture doesn't effect people except when we might otherwise conclude something racist

>>9607895
How many of these women scientists being drawn have a penis?

Is there like a generalization of pythagorean triples for higher dimensions? I understand Fermat's last theorem seems to contravene this but my intuition is there should be some logically rigorous way to find the equivalent of these for higher exponent values. For instance in the pythagorean equation 2 squares are added so could 3 cubes add up to a fourth cube? Admittedly, I'm an uneducated brainlet but I cannot help that these kind of questions fascinate me.

Is there seriously any scientific evidence to back noFap other than anecdotes? Normies and chads have sex multiple times everyday and yet they’re always brimming with confidence and optimism. So I don’t understand how voluntary abstinence from fapping will somehow make you more confident and motivated. Isn’t this the kind of shit catholic priests practised and yet still molested young boys in secret?

Is there seriously any scientific evidence to back noFap other than anecdotes? Normies and chads have sex multiple times everyday and yet they’re always brimming with confidence and optimism

>>9513404
>believing in what has not been proven
what did he mean by this lads?

Yes. Electrons somehow turn to protons. Particles suddenly act like waves when the electron is not even a particle but a cloud. I'm a brainlet btw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Op3QLzMgSY

>CS is not a science
>CS is not about computers
then why is called computer science?