[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15366675 [View]
File: 2.98 MB, 3840x2160, O'Neill Cylinder Space Colony.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15366675

For human colonization of space, are space colonies such as O'Neill cylinders and Stanford torus's actually viable options for permanent human presence, or are all space stations too weak and fragile for humans to live on, requiring an entire planet that can take and sustain the abuse that humans make? In other words, if you can't detonate a nuclear bomb on/in it, then it isn't good enough for human living.

>> No.14993456 [View]
File: 2.98 MB, 3840x2160, O'Neill Cylinder Space Colony Aesthetic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14993456

Is it economically feasible to construct an L5 colony?
>Guestimate mass required for colony: 10,000,000 metric tons
>@ $100/kg = $1,000,000,000,000 dollars
>Roughly 5% of current GDP for the US
>This is assuming the $100/kg is coming from Earths surface rather than from the moon which would undoubtedly be significantly cheaper per kg (implying we already had infrastructure for large scale mining and processing)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]