[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.3380164 [View]
File: 181 KB, 838x1222, emily_browning_1295458554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3380164

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutoff_function

inbetween you multiply by 1/(x-c)^2.

???
Profit.

>> No.3356722 [View]
File: 181 KB, 838x1222, emily_browning_1295458554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3356722

>>3356700
In the second línk under competitors there are some private sci-teams listed

>> No.2977299 [View]
File: 181 KB, 838x1222, emily_browning_1295458554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2977299

Temporal PrimeDirective

!=

Prime Directive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Directive#Temporal_Prime_Directive

>> No.2966820 [View]
File: 181 KB, 838x1222, emily_browning_1295458554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2966820

What is the significance of the sperical harmonics?

What is the deepest property, insight or viewpoint on them that you know?
How to view them in the big picture?

>> No.2938550 [View]
File: 181 KB, 838x1222, emily_browning_1295458554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2938550

DerBerg

it's "the mountain" in german
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berg

>> No.2926377 [View]
File: 181 KB, 838x1222, emily_browning_1295458554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2926377

>>2926361
are you familiar with matrices?

>> No.2860175 [View]
File: 181 KB, 838x1222, emily_browning_1295458554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2860175

I think I'm close to the solution.
I want to argue that the path above s can only be taken into one direction (namely to the left) - if you, then you can reconstruct the only possible way and it may turn out that non exists

>> No.2831695 [View]
File: 181 KB, 838x1222, emily_browning_1295458554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2831695

>Postulate local ISO(1,3) invariance, get GR.
>Postulate local U(1) invariance, get EM.

Fair enough I see your view point. (Although "postulate invariance" of what. in the second case you want invariance for some fields in spacetime, in the first case you're talking about space itself. But yeah okay.)

Anyway, you argue that adding U(1) everywhere seems natural or "more fundamental" but then you could add just add any fibre. Like Su(3) or O(56).
Also, the if you view it like you do, you could say that adding a hamsterweel U(1) and adding the hyperhamsterweel ISO(1,3) both ist just Cartan Geometry and Lorentz trafos would not be more funamental than electromagnetism.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]