/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5597964
The fact that on a minor scale we can replicate the big-bang and see evidence that indeed, it makes the most sense that what the creation of the universe is, is what we do in laboratories on a much larger scale.

Now granted, this still does not quite answer the fact of how unsentient forces could replicate such intricit and complex creations involuntarily. But we're getting ahead of ourselves here...

1: Whose to say the cosmos itself is not some sort of super brain endowed with it's own sort of intelligence that transcends our own? Trying to communicate with the stars would be like our red blood cells and skin flakes trying to communicate with us.

2: It is incomprehensible from a human perspective to simply create something without some sort of logical foundation. If God is simply some artsy guy with a compulsion, we have the right to criticize His work. If perhaps there is a more moral reason, that there are plans at work for a greater good, then I'm just not seeing it and you can't blame me for being skeptical given what I do see.

2/10. I ain't even mad, but you got me to reply creationistfag.