/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6442758
>>>6442754 (You)
>But caring isn't to do with perception. Two people with identical perceptions may care about different things.

Proof?

I think, that in realistic terms you'd have trouble finding two people that perceive something identically outside of quantum entanglement.

So thats the first part of your statement bullshit.

Next.

>"caring isnt to do with perception"

Then, prat tell, what purpose is perception for? If perception is not for survival. What is it for?

So in total, your argument fails and you should feel very stupid. Which in a way brings us full circle from your denial of IQ tests.

Your emotional bias is clear; you dont like realizing how stupid you are. But if you wish to deal with something the first step is admitting its there in the first place.

Things do not vanish because you dont think about them. This is a conceit and is the basis of natural selection.