/sci/ - Science & Math

>1 isn't considered a prime number
My background is in metaphysics, so this question hadn't crossed my path until now, but ...

Well, has any philosopher or mathematician considered that 1, being the symbol of the metaphysical unity of all discriminate substance, is comprised itself out of the subjective experience of phenomenal reality and that of its logically necessary reciprocal condition of unconsciousness? 1 is an abstract object comprised of two subjects, that of being and non-being. Every other number is merely the multiplication of that proposition. Ergo, 1 should be considered prime because 2 is considered prime.

Now, mathchads, explain how I'm retarded.

Take this final redpill.
Right now there are many forces fighting for who gets credits getting humanity permantally into space.