/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12135723

>>11448743
Also, the top document is a perpetual WIP but so far not 1.0, many things planned when I have time. I have like 200 documents open. A lot of people have already done this kind of work (and are listed in the "additional resources" section) but the current plan is to keep the existing section breaking down by type of effect and body system, and have a duplicate section categorizing by signal characteristic or specific type of device (eg wifi etc). The purpose of this document is to collect and synthesize a broad range of sources and to structure the whole RF history in one place, but I think I have to go back to basics and maximize its initial and at a glance utility. ie, someone wants to know about wifi, there it is, wifi section.

This is planned.

>>11352172
It's just the natural course of adaptation to experience, I'm not sure what's so ambiguous about it, it's simple fatigue. Basically I've been researching for over 6 years now. I've presented to state senate committees, I've made threads on here and replied to people elsewhere, I've talked to people I've known for ten years to my entire life, I've talked to acquaintances. I have a packet full of hard data and summaries 3 inches thick, and even if you can get people to read a single sentence on one page. Nothing changes. The data is ignored.

Mediafire has download counters, which is part of why I use it. I stress to people how important this is, give a general overview of what's going on and how we got here, the effect it's having on whatever thing is relevant particularly their children and grandchildren,. Write down the link. Nothing. They never read it or download a single file.

I don't get much from talking about the effects of electromagnetic fields on biological systems generally. I use some (too much) time this way nonetheless because I recognize it's necessary and I have an obligation to inform others ,where they've indicated some interest and potential to benefit. There is nothing more important than one's health. And there's a much bigger picture here, as well. Meaningless terms, however, until you live it.

>>11352175
As far as this guy goes, he likes to post that pastebin often. Some of the posts are mine, some of them aren't. His accuracy isn't horrible, but it's not great either. I came back after several months and found some threads where he'd labeled other posters as "The" 5G schizo. I've been over his link in full prior, which naturally he would never include. He seems to trawl the archives, like any good story he establishes a hard skeleton, then he looks for posts to flesh it and weave together into a compelling narrative.

I usually just ignore him. I'd like to think the irony wouldn't be lost on most people.

>>11345426
Exhausting, illegitimate infantile behavior. It didn't used to be this way.

You "win" for now. 5G schizo will go away and now badfeel and badthink will fade away, like it does for any addict. What a tragic nightmare.

Reminder that right now, today, if you put a cell phone directly to your head, or directly against your body, you're exceeding exposure guidelines by several times.

Gandhi 2019 - Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and the US When Touching the Body
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8688629

See also:
Gandhi 2012 - Exposure Limits: The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999884
https://ehtrust.org/a-summary-exposure-limits-the-underestimation-of-absorbed-cellphone-radiation-especially-in-children/

Om P Gandhi was active during the making of these standards, and worked in the Brooks air force base research / propaganda apparatus. Like many from that era, he did a hard 180 later on.