/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12342611
>Absolute as in objective
Objective negation leads to synthetic synthesis. Time is an arbitrary measure, not something objective to be negated. You fucking lose.

>In fact "everywhere" is pointless here because time transcends space
Another useless statement because space has no properties. You can't even tell me what space is yet you use it in a comparison. Garbage.

>Point is all entities (consciousnesses, universes, points in space, etc) experience time identically.
Time is a measurement. In the case of "seconds" it has to do with the rate a cesium atom farts. A measure based on what something real does, why? Because it lacks the actual foundation to be something in and of itself.
Time ultimately DOES NOT EXIST.

>>10597050
>Using water doesn’t make more water vapor.
>moving water doesn't make it easier to move to the point what it turns to vapor.

In nature, water comes from rivers, rain, oceans etc. Not sprinkler heads, drainways, water treatment plants, hot roads, refrigeration coils, asphalt shingles and large flat farmland. It all adds up. The water vapor has increased drastically because we literally use it for everything including inane bullshit. This is overlooked because your "climatologists" are playing "blind men and an elephant" with CO2.

>>10538091
>Typical denialtard, deliberately ignoring the absolute fact of absorption and emission of EM radiation. Surface warming with changing concentration of greenhouse gases is just the truth.

read>>10537750
>Fuels are great for reliability, but the climate issue means they must be phased out.
>the climate is what made the fuel though..
>not an argument

What do trees breathe? Do you not care about them too?

>1. you don't give a shit about birds faggot
Sounds more like YOU don't give a shit about birds actually since you'd rather have an inefficient and unwanted product killing them. Wind is on par with DDT.

>2. Anti-technology revolution is the only option long-term. Uncle Ted knew this. Resources are finite, and so are the parameters of habitability.
>he believes the peak oil meme
>references parameters of habitability yet wants to use sources that require thousands of miles of space

>>10469990
I am though.

>>10469966
>Not going to debate retarded semantics
You can't "argue semantics" about something if it doesn't exist. Things that don't exist have no meaning whatsoever. That's why I'm skipping that step. Now prove it exist. THEN we can talk semantics.

>>10469973
>visible photons
Pics or it didn't happen. Also I thought it was both "particles AND waves"?

>>10470097
>inb4 what is magnitude
m-mm-mag-magnetism?