/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15438106
I can concede your counterpoint in the case of Prop 2.1 and agree that the proposition does contain a "then" statement. However, I cannot concede regarding Prop 3.7. There is no "then" condition. You have moved the goalpost from including a "then" statement. Now you say the problem is that I asked the reader to suppose the proposition was valid rather than merely stating the proposition while letting the article type "Proposition" convey to the reader that I wanted to suppose the condition stated in the article. This issue reflects nothing but a choice of prose. It's like your criticism is that I called it a proposition rather than a supposition.