/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6919496
>I get the feeling your are afraid of your feels

Nope. I think my feels are fucking fantastic Anon. Emotions are a vital part the human experience. I actually love dramas and shit like that.

The only problem I have is when people use "feels" as a replacement for objective coherent rational arguments. When people cannot differentiate better subjective and objective arguments. It is annoying as fuck and has no place in science or mathematics. It is retarded.

>>3148015
> validity to Entropic Gravity

Nope.
There are hundreds of "neat" ideas about gravity, entropic gravity is just one of many. Right now, it is not a validated inquiry of science. It has very few supporters (only those with a stake in it), and hasn't yet proved itself as a correct form of reasoning.

It may turn out to be true, just like any other of those hundreds of ideas could be true. But until it actually is produces signifigant results and predictions, it is a waste of time in general. You cannot give crediance to all the crazy ideas out there, that would be fucking retarded (and is not scientific reasoning).

>>2372905
If time and space are expanding, so are our ways to measure time and distance.

We could not measure this type of "self-expansion", as we wouldn't have a reference frame.

>>2264892
The two forms of mass are not differentiated. There is only one kind of mass. Both a particle and it's antiparticle have the same mass.
Mass can be convereted into energy, and visa versa.

Aristotle is not amused...

James Clerk Maxwell

>>1242854
"It is better to have one scientist by your side, then a whole army of engineers" - J. Maxwell