/sci/ - Science & Math

>I WILL WRITE THIS ANONYMOUS RESPONSE TO A BASIC QUESTION USING EVERY BIG SCIENCE WORD I KNOW
> THEN EVERYONE WILL SEE HOW SMART I AM
>GAHT 'IM !

>>12592871
>You're completely failing to understand the underlying point of my post. Lack of social intelligence perhaps? I made a completely arrogant claim because I mistook knowing what I knew for knowing much more about the field. I got outed for it straight away.
>The point was that 'what you don't know' isn't the opposite of 'what you do know'. If you kid yourself into thinking it is i.e thinking that you're the only smart person you know, or thinking that you're a master at the cello, or thinking that you're a great cook, then you're going to fundamentally limit yourself because you aren't going to update 'what you don't know'. Your ability is always going to be constrained to that upper limit.
>So yes, my anecdote is entirely relevant to OP's post, you just seem to lack any broader understanding of it beyond the functional meaning of the words. Are you stupid, autistic, or are you just a seething poster?

>>12136001
>Hello.schizo. Which millennium level puzzle or nobel prize winning discovery have you made now that leaders in the field are all conspiring to keep you from publishing?

>>12133692
kek

>don't google Roko's basilisk