/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8873996
that guy's not me, but point taken. I'll phrase things more rigorously.

>>8874017
your waifu a shit


>>8874058
>>8874046
We've been over this in EVERY SINGLE THREAD. The only readings showing those kinds of high CO2 levels are ones with serious methodological flaws, particularly the pre-1890 ones using open-system measuring techniques.
You just keep babbling that inconvenient readings were thrown out for no reason, despite the very real and well-supported rationale for excluding them.

>>8874046
>Funny how warmists control almost every single journal and then if there's one journal that they don't control. ITS EVIL.
E&E literally accepted and published a manuscript claiming that the Sun is a giant ball of iron, despite every reviewer they sent it out to (correctly) calling the paper a hot load of shit. It's become a clearinghouse for pseudoscience.
Also, the head editor openly admits to using the journal to push her political agenda, but you think there's nothing wrong with that?
>What a bunch of crybabies.
this from the guy who insists that it's the fault of a giant conspiracy every time people he like can't get their papers published in respectable journals, rather than those papers just being shit.

>>8618576
>Please give one example where it was 3 degrees warmer in a place for a decade and everything turned into a desert. Give one example of a 3 degree temerature shift that ever resulted in anything more than a totally negligable effect on the enviornment.
An increase of JUST 0.68 C has caused huge swathes of the Great Barrier Reef, a massive hub of marine biodiversity, to fucking DIE.
>http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/managing-the-reef/threats-to-the-reef/climate-change/how-climate-change-can-affect-the-reef/rising-sea-temperatures
terrestrial ecosystems don't have the heat sink of water to stabilize their temperatures, so they tend to tolerate small changes fairly well. (even they are vulnerable, though.) but the oceans? prevailing weather patterns and ocean currents determine the temperature, pH, salinity, and nutrient density of an area, and those hardly change over the years (even with seasonal variation). so the organisms that live there are adapted to those specific conditions, and the balance is delicate. this is the sort of thing you'd have learned if you'd studied oceanography or invertebrate paleoecology or any related science.
how little you know.