/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10959128
I've looked through it before, I'll revisit if I get time, nice concise graphic.

>or again infinitesimal
really, I don't even think it right the more I consider it, would be a finite number, unless the divisor was infinity.

I likely won't respond too much though, have to do some other stuff today. Have fun with your fresh victims, bwahahaha.

>>10591536
The RH was stated more like show all the zeros have real part of 1/2 or show one that doesn't. So it's not really "true or false" in that sense, but rather people associate True with them all being a=1/2 which was Riemann's suspicion, and False being another zero with different a in the critical domain. My proof agrees with Riemann, saying it's true.

However, the implications if it were false, would be the opposite of if it were true. And before you go all captain obvious on me on that one, I'm saying that the RH is connected to 20 plus other problems in math. So proving it true, will instantly confirm all those, or oppositely proving it false would have all those implications as well.

>>10328316
Now that's not very nice. I'm just asking what that person should do if they did solve it. What would you do? And let's say I was that person, would you really want to be talking that way to person that solved it?