/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14871615
>Yes, they are, how do you even define vectors without tuples?
Have you ever read like the first chapter of a Linear Algebra book, you absolute worthless talentless trash?
>And why not just write...
Because there is no [math] v_{i>n}[/math] defined, hence not allowed in set theoretic notation.

>>14871799
>I'm asking because the notation you're suggesting is tiresome with tensors.
Define your own notation for 'is an element of vector.' I do it all the time. I have my own notation for the set of upper bounds, linear dependence, continuity, etc.
>B-but this is a good thing
I am not talking about trannies "like" Hunter Schafer. They are not trannies, they are real women.