[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11743017 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, enough.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11743017

>>11742860
>working together to stop police brutality
You must be under 13 years old as these riots happen every few years and accomplish literally nothing but grief
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Dvwn4aXE8s&t=56s

>> No.11603745 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, enough.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11603745

>>11597669
>Trump asks if disinfectants or uv light could be used to kill a virus
>CNN states he is directly telling people to drink bleach
They day that media found out that there is more money to be made in biased news than genuine news was the day this country began its downward spiral.

>> No.11487464 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, enough.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11487464

>doesn't believe in God
>believes that life exists on other planets despite not knowing what the probability of life beginning is
Can someone explain this concept to me?
Reputable people keeping saying its statistically improbable that life doesn't exist elsewhere but I don't understand where the "statistics" are coming from. Did someone figure out the probability of life beginning behind closed doors or something?

>> No.11379399 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, enough.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11379399

>>11373998
perfect, now all that needs to be done is research as to whether this change happens outside of birth due to external forces, compounds.

>> No.11340675 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, enough.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11340675

>>11340626
>I don't believe in God
>I believe that aliens exist despite not knowing what the probability of life beginning is
These people deserve to be shot.

>> No.10256408 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, enough.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10256408

>it's statistically impossible we are alone in the universe
When will this meme die? How are they coming up with this statistic?

>> No.9845086 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, 1465349655457.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9845086

>>9841854
/thread
let's stop having this discussion now

>> No.9371008 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, 1439675612480.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9371008

>ace the exam
>exam score doesn't replace lowest test score
>no curve will be applied
>no extra credit
>still end up with a C

I'm about to make columbine look like a fucking joke

>> No.8081603 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, 1460944040296.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8081603

why the fuck is there even a square root sign if it has to be converted to a power of one half anyways?

>> No.7917229 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, GODAMNFUCKINGDAMIT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7917229

So Who's good with Azimuthal Equidistant conversions here?

I have a data set of Azimuthal Equidistant xy coorindates, I need to convert them to lat long (decimale degrees). How do I go about this?

OR alternatively, I have corresponding lat longs in a different spreadsheet with xy coordinates next to them. However these spreadsheets are 14000+ rows, so I'd have to somehow have to "dig out" the xy and corresponding lat long values of interest (in Libreoffice).

If anyone have a script for R that the conversion would be done in that's even better, but all I've found so far is scripts for doing the inverse.

>> No.7695107 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, 1445333780644.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7695107

>>7694984
Not that anon, but he is. I could fap to the pic where Wittgenstein poses before messy the blackboard.

>> No.7602751 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, pepe634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7602751

>>7602750

>> No.7506051 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, 1433685737371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7506051

While we're on topic:
Does anyone have any clue how to derive the lagrangian itself. We used Hamiltons variational principle to derive the euler lagrange equations but they just gave us L = T - V
How do you get the T - V?

>> No.7494930 [View]
File: 17 KB, 316x239, 1440203728380.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7494930

Why can't any of you faggots learn to fucking debate? This is why sci is riddled with bipartisanshit! You doubleniggers are either one extreme or the other.

Let me fucking show you something:

Conciousness is still a startling mystery. Maybe we already know the answer, maybe we are terribly far from the truth. It is probably less complex than some would write off to mystical mojo, but it is definitely more complex than materialists would like to believe.

WE. DO. NOT. FUCKING. KNOW. YET.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]