/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7991470
>putting basic product features like price, recharge time and safety into an faq list hidden within the CONTACT part of your webpage, instead of the actual product page
yeah, their inability to code a webpage worth a shit is absolutely my problem,
fucking fagtron

>>7714135
and before you say that you're totally not like them
every single thread that starts with an apparent pipe dream premise and no factual evidence proving the feasibility and profitability(which is the very basic that you need in order to get any kind of project going in the real world) has ended this way

someone posts a logical counter argument that shoots a big ol' hole into the totally-awesome-believe-me-guys idea of the OP
the OP can't handle that his idea isn't actually the best thing since sliced bread
but he has no counter against the counter argument
so what does he do?
"you're just close minded"
"nothing is written in stone!"
"your opinion is defeatist!"
"150 years ago they said computers would be pointless!!"

if you ever set foot into the real world, where people use real engineering practices, you'll quickly notice that in order to persuade people into funding your shenanigans you need some sort of fact telling them WHY your idea is actually good

>>6460747

>>4920017
[sarcasm] oh noes! that really hurts my feelings![/sarcasm]