/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5636118
All my evidence of you non creativity can be distilled from any one of your comments, "lol"

Please stop and migrate to >>>/hm/

>>5485306

>>5420221
If you're trying to sound smart you just failed.

>>5286206
>I'd rather listen to dumb people

>Sorry for being retarded
That's not going to cut it. Read your damn book.

Amuse yourself with this:

char array[7];
char a = 'a';

for (int i = 0; i < 7; )
array[i++] = a++;

>>5188402

>>4973574
No you can't distinguish them you underage retard.

>>4815396

I think there is quite a lot more than a hint.

We recognize that morality is relative to human beings. So to address morality, I believe all we must do is ask what unique human features give us moral questions, and what human features must we appeal to.

Seeing as we live in an objective reality, it would actually pretty exceptional if these human related concepts were some how not objective, am I right?

>Shame, really, but what's to be done?

I dont know.

I remember when they announced that. Lawrence Krauss works at my university, and I think he was somehow involved in the findings. By happen stance I had scheduled a time in his office hours the day or two after all this Higgs Boson talk arose. I remember he said he almost can't believe it to be true.

He didnt say this, but, his attitude reminded me of something I know about Plato. I think Plato believed that everything that is true could be determined through thought alone. To achieve truth you dont actually need anything. Dr. Krauss, while I was talking to him almost demonstrated the opposite, in that he felt that it was impossible that an idea had turned out to be true.

Is all of paranormal shit complete bullshit?

http://kimchibokkeumbap.blogspot.com/2011/10/are-japanese-uncreative.html

>rely on rote teaching methods and memorization to a much greater extent than do U.S. and European schools.

>The Japanese Government is concerned that lower levels of creativity in Japanese graduates could place them at a disadvantage in developing high-level skills in such areas as computer programming and systems integration."


>lower levels of creativity in Japanese graduates could place them at a disadvantage
>computer programming and systems integration.

>creativity
>computer programming


Tell me /sci/, how important is creativity when it comes to work that involves 99% perspiration and 0~1% inspiration most especially if you're working in a team where that inspiration needs a hundred times more sweat so as to actually bear fruition?

Because you are a fish, Jeremy. You are a fish.

Is the world cleverly adapting itself to tease us?

>>4133076
>mfw there's an x in the upper right corner on wikipedia to "block that shit out"

>>4132540
>>4132544
>>4132545
>>4132551
>>4132552
You sound like a bunch of pussies and certainly not like a scientist.

>>4123514
Just. Stop. Just stop.

So if you recursively take a half of something, do you end up with nothing?

>that feel when programming gets increasingly more complex every time you gain solid understanding in anything

>>3494602

>>Most economists know more about economics than you do.

>I would have to disagree.

You think you know more about economics than people who dedicate their careers to the subject?

MON VISAGE

>>2906601

Why wouldnt I be able to sell it? Just because cars are "free" doesnt mean the parts that go into making a car are free. In fact, I bet a car would be very valuable even just as raw materials.

Cars that cant leave the city? What a shitty car.

Im not even addressing the larger problems with such a car system.

>>2386722
"biased"

and you are quite welcome.

books. study. go now.

>>2330043
that's not what OP said...you can't add stuff now!

>>2314521

Chimps didn't give birth to humans you imbecile.

Go and read up on the mechanism of natural selection, and how evolution happened, THEN come back and debate us on the finer points of why that model is wrong.

If you aren't going to take the time to learn the subject you're debating, why should I take the time to consider your stance?