/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8155663
i might dump a few

>>8079442
>>8079449
shit gcse's:
3A*,5A,B,2C

as:
4A

got an offer (A*A*A) for the summer do maths and philosophy next year.

and my maths UMS was shit-tear (compared to full-ums fags)

and i didnt have further maths as / wont have further maths a level at the end of the year

oxford clearly dont give a shit about grades compared to cambridge. they have a Maths Aptitude Test which they use a lot though

>>8076744
you do realise that the UMS is distributed such that a fixed proportion always get 100? i got 100 in c1 last year. most people going to do maths/physics/computing/economics at uni in my school got full UMS in maths/further maths.

maybe you went to a shit school?

So I did some basic algebra and I got to...

v^2=2Tc

where
v=average velocity of the particles (m/s)
T=absolute tempreture (K)
c=specific heat capacity (J/kg/K)

is this correct. it seems too tidy to be obvious and google ain't givin' a brotha nuffin'

Is there a limit to how complicated a concept you can comprehend?
Are there any concepts you will never get?
I'm a big sceptic of the "growth mindset" commie ideology. Am I just projecting?