/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7485733
>If the science doesn't have enough information to determine that AGW is real, why did it determine that AGW is real?
it didn't, there is not 1 single conclusive finding or study

>You can't have it both ways. Either climatologists are experts on the climate or are part of a massive conspiracy to create fake science. Which is it?
Well, again you're wrong; the 2 are not mutually exclusive. I don't think there's a conspiracy, per say. I just think thousands of experts are jumping the gun and on top of that it is wholly possible that they are all simply incorrect. Maybe they just have differing opinions. There have been many times before where, literally, the entire scientific community was wrong while only a 2 or 3 scientists were right. Don't be so naive to think it can't ever happen again.