/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9069253
>mfw people over the ages attempt to challenge physicalism

It's like watching some child try to take on Muhammad Ali

>all these disgusting druggies ITT
Excellent work on relying on any external substance to get anything done. Truly the height of brainletdom.

>>8745652
>Too much reliance on "faith".
ur the only one bringing up "faith" in this thread here m88. who are you quoting? :^)
>typical denier, beats strawman

>FAMALAM WHYYY
because I knew you're too autismal not to respond. squeal like a pig!

>>8586325
>This is from a review of a play
W E W L A D
E W E A D L
W E W D L A
L A D W E W
A D L E W E
D L A W E W

>I'm called the Bus Driver b/c I'm a cautionary tale about why it's important to stay in school and apply yourself so that you can become a skilled laborer or a professional of some sort instead of ferrying brats around like me
FTFY

1. No, of course not, you retard.
1.1. Sort of. The moon's gravity pulls water higher up, it slumps back down as the Earth's rotation moves it away from the moon (this explains one tide, the other tide is sort of the opposite effect), tides are the result, and we can harvest energy from that slump-back-down part.
1.1.1. No real effects of harvesting the energy of tides. The moon's orbit is affected (slowed down) very slowly, as is the Earth's rotation, but the effect is pretty much immeasurable on human scales. The energy we collect would otherwise basically just disperse as heat eventually if we didn't.

1.2. We don't have the infrastructure in place yet, and there are questions about how it might affect shore ecosystems.
1.2.1. Nothing.

TL;DR not magnets, but gravity

>>7089685
>anthropomorphic climate change
>anthropomorphic global warming
this nigga right here...

>>7066599
>Yosemite Supervolcano