/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3274462
>make's claims
>doesn't provide evidence
>asserts I must refute his claim

Science, how does it work?

>ITT: /sci/ once again confirmed for stupidest board in all the chans

Sensible ways to perform this function would be

1)generate PRN, hash it, compare hash with hash given by operator
2)generate PRN, hash it with salt, compare hash with hash given by operator

2 is secure, 1 is insecure but you'd still need to know the hash algorithm

OP, disconnect the vehicle battery, wait ~3-5min, reconnect battery, generate a code, write down code, disconnect the battery again, wait ~3-5min, reconnect battery, generate a new code. If the PRNG was implemented lazily the codes will be the same, in which case you can use them over again by resetting the system.

>>2641203
>Kinsey scale
Kinsey Sexual Fantasy scores in 'straight' women are not only inconsistent with genital arousal, but inconsistent with subjective assessment of arousal

>All the women reported having sexual feelings almost exclusively toward men; their mean Kinsey Sexual Fantasy score was 0.1 (SD = 0.1). . .subjective arousal to female-female stimuli was twice their subjective arousal to male-male stimuli

>>2641417
>I would say that we are all bisexual
The data does not support this position.

1)Genital PPG(Photoplethysmography) reports strong category specific sexual arousal(CSSA) in men, but no CSSA in women. This can not be explained by socialization as gay men show CSSA, just towards men instead of women.

2)Behavioral data, namely homosexual activity in 'straight' women, and heterosexual activity in 'gay' women. Again, this can't be explained by socialization as (again) we would expect to observe the same behavior in gay men(which we don't)