[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12698071 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 112 KB, 250x242, 1588944977530.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12698071

>>12698043
obviously it's a joke, but since this site is almost completely a /pol/ colony now that means there are schizoids in every thread who would unironically believe it

>> No.11650156 [View]
File: 112 KB, 250x242, Bullshit_but_I_believe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11650156

>>11646049

>> No.11371688 [View]
File: 112 KB, 250x242, your post.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11371688

>>11370459

>> No.10148718 [View]
File: 112 KB, 250x242, Bullshit_but_I_believe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10148718

>>10148567
>>10148567
>In mathematical biology he is known as the originator of a class of relational models of living organisms, called {\displaystyle (M{,}R)} {\displaystyle (M{,}R)}-systems that he devised to capture the minimal capabilities that a material system would need in order to be one of the simplest functional organisms that are commonly said to be "alive". In this kind of system, {\displaystyle M} M stands for the metabolic and {\displaystyle R} R stands for the 'repair' subsystems of a simple organism, for example active 'repair' RNA molecules. Thus, his mode for determining or "defining" life in any given system is a functional, not material, mode; although he did consider in his 1970s published reports specific dynamic realizations of the simplest {\displaystyle (M{,}R)} {\displaystyle (M{,}R)}-systems in terms of enzymes ( {\displaystyle M} M), RNA ( {\displaystyle R} R), and functional, duplicating DNA (his {\displaystyle \beta } \beta -mapping).
v. cool
Robert Rosen seems like an interesting guy and I believe his bullshit

>>10148702
>i never remotely implied such
I know you didn't and I was making fun of you missing the point

>no it isn't. It's just evident by observation that they are. How they do it is literally subject of multiple fields of science
Thanks, now link me some sources to those fields of science so I can learn about it as asked in the original question

>because? Other than a possibly interesting field of research this question holds no relevance whatsoever right now.
Because I asked and I care

>the whole universe has to obey thermodynamics you absolute shithead
I know the universe has to, but differential equations I write down don't

>pretty sure this isn't even a meaningful sentence
Ya got me

>>10148699
See the discussion with the other cumbersome retard

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]