/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7695442
Please elaborate on your problem with someone defining through they are and their personal nuances of looking for a discovery as opposed to trying to maliciously hurt someones feelings in an effort to communicate that you don't want to be an upstanding citizen and instead be a degenerate that will never actually even attempt to do anything new for fear of it being rejected

I'm putting this on /sci/ in an effort to communicate the availability of scripting that is not used and that it can profile some of the structure mathematics, as noted with the term profile, with a different perspective
You don't have to participate if you don't want to but this quick riddle will provide a solution to my point.

>You have a line
>you turn it sideways
>you have a wall

>infinitesimals to reals

Do YOU understand what's happening?

>>7466928
>you can't invalidate religion because god is undefined
You can define it by saying its the universe and the universe is made of energy and that is an synonym for fire and you can go as far to say that god is in hell
>#edgy

>evolution however is defined but not proven
'proven'; proofs are things that rely on previous sentiments being concurrent to the following element, this is a proof
When you say that evolution is un-provable you're essentially saying that maths have infinite sets in all sets and each of the original sets are subsets of any set at all and that is what it is when you go and start mixing DNA together
imo the process of making another creature to the point of exposure to fresh air is enough to outline the basis of evolution and creationism

>>6539259
It's like the instantaneous speed of a speedometer versus the average speed between two points (or places, to complete the analogy).