[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.5736961 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 13 KB, 500x375, ilikethread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5736961

Can anyone refute this paper?

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/TheMissingJolt7.pdf

tl;dr here's its conclusion:
"We have tracked the fall of the roof of the North Tower through 114.4 feet, (approximately 9 stories) and we have found that it did not suffer severe and sudden impact or abrupt deceleration. There was no jolt. Thus there could not have been any amplified load. In the absence of an amplified load there is no mechanism to explain the collapse of the lower portion of the building, which was undamaged by fire."

>> No.3501928 [View]
File: 13 KB, 500x375, ilikethread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3501928

>>3501905

>> No.2819286 [View]
File: 13 KB, 500x375, ilikethread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2819286

>> No.2563179 [View]
File: 13 KB, 500x375, ilikethread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2563179

Somehow this is turning into the dumbest thread on /sci/.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]