[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.8588973 [View]
File: 20 KB, 527x273, Global Cooling affects polar vortex.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8588973

>>8588356
That's funny. Once upon a time they said the "breaking of the cell barriers," i.e., change of the polar vortex was caused by global cooling.

>nb4 warmist paper claiming global cooling was just a journalism fad
http://notrickszone.com/285-papers-70s-cooling-1/#sthash.PJoHxopP.dpbs
http://notrickszone.com/285-papers-70s-cooling-2/#sthash.lRcCIvlK.dpbs
http://notrickszone.com/285-papers-70s-cooling-3/#sthash.Tw3Ix8qy.dpbs

>An 83% Global Cooling/Weak CO2 Influence Scientific ‘Consensus’ During 1960s, ’70s
>As will be shown here, the claim that there were only 7 publications from that era disagreeing with the presupposed CO2-warming “consensus” >is preposterous. Because when including the papers from the 1960s and 1970s that indicated the globe had cooled (by -0.3° C between the >1940s and ’70s), that this cooling was concerning (leading to extreme weather, drought, depressed crop yields, etc.), and/or that CO2’s climate >influence was questionable to negligible, a conservative estimate for the number of scientific publications that did not agree with the alleged >CO2-warming “consensus” was 220 papers for the 1965-’79 period, not 7. If including papers published between 1960 and 1989, the
>“non-consensus” or “cooling” papers reaches 285.

>> No.6867437 [View]
File: 20 KB, 527x273, Global Cooling affects polar vortex.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6867437

>>6867261
Yeah, Global Cooling is moving the polar vortex! See attached, that's what they said in the 1970s.

Oh wait!
Now they say Global Warming is moving the polar vortex. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

>> No.6770252 [View]
File: 20 KB, 527x273, Global Cooling affects polar vortex.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6770252

>>6770154

It used to be Global Cooling that affected the Polar Vortex

Science News, Vol. 107
March 1, 1975
During cooler climatic periods, however, the high-altitude winds are broken up into irregular cells by weaker and more plentiful pressure centers, causing formation of a “meridional circulation” pattern. These small, weak cells may stagnate over vast areas for many months, bringing unseasonably cold weather on one side and unseasonably warm weather on the other. Droughts and floods become more frequent and may alternate season to season, as they did last year in India. Thus, while the hemisphere as a whole is cooler, individual areas may alternately break temperature and precipitation records at both extremes. If global temperatures should fall even further, the effects could be considerably more drastic. According to the academy (National Academy Of Sciences) report on climate, we may be approaching the end of a major interglacial cycle, with the approach of a full-blown 10,000-year ice age, a real possibility

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]