/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8996126
>He altered a plaster
The original flares out like a chimps, not like a man's.

>yes yes, the only
The evidence that goes against you is for me.

>how do you know for sure?
They were filthy deists trying to play God, much like evolutionists now.

>what part of "apelike
I see a lot of ape, but absolutely no human of any sort.

>Maybe I need to repeat this again
Certainly more of a struggle for them.

>you never had a case to begin with
The holes in yours say otherwise.

>except I've already established that that's false.
I don't know what kind of wonku version of common sense you're using, because I know the earth is not flat from the curve I observed in an airplane.

>one, that's false
The tracks look nothing like STW 573's foot.

>scientists don't claim to know everything either.
Like stated previously, the "evidence" is ambiguous at best, and fallacious at worst.

>and that's just a lie.
I see models and plaster, not the actual fossils.