/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9681337
Oh, I just realized I didn't actually address your question:
>>9681337
>So there IS a difference to a person by sleeping or being unconscious
Sure, technically you're conscious (aware of your surroundings) while asleep.
Actually being unconscious is an extremely rare condition, but either way, it's unrelated the "consciousness" in the sense of being a self-aware sentient/sapient being.

>>8272914
>PS watch the full video before shit talking it.
Blow me.
"Hey guise, here's this total pop-sci thing I want you to spend 40 minutes watching".
Tell ya what OP: come over and spend 40 minutes mowing my lawn, and I'll watch yer video.

>I went in very critical
No, you didn't.
I'm very critical, and there's no way I'd watch a 4 minute video on this.
If you've got an idea that will overturn 90 years of QM, at least give a summary for fuck's sake.

>>8248293
>the neural architecture, the amount of electrolytes present, the amount of endogenous and exogenous substances present, and on the bottom of all of this, physical laws.
All of this is a part of who I am.

>A ball which rolls down a hill does not change its path from itself but only due to external influences.
And that makes it completely different than a human being.

>>8248449
>I think the universe is probabilistic
>What I meant was, that the output is determined (or governed) by physical law.

What you mean is: "If i was comfortable with vague, irreproducible results, I would have studied biology, but I like absolute answers, with simple, mathematical models that always apply in an absolute sense. That's why I studied physics."
Embrace the fuzzy, vague nature of reality, and not the cold, sterile void that appeals to your sense of ordnung.

>>7943687
>My waifu is a barista
My waifu is Bea Arthur

>>7910235
>My waifu is pic related.
Bea Arthur for me, please!

WTF's with the new captcha???