/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4253350
somewhere in europe.....

-2² = ???

http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U76kQBdYgrQ

Seriously though, environment, culture and the flynn effect play a huge role.

>>3375069

You're from blackpool i see

>>3205481
>>3205477

hahaha. We're supposed to believe that you and her aren't the same person

It is unnatural for humans to not murder and rape, therefore murder and rape are ok!

Lets say the predominant black culture is largely anti-intellectual.
And lets say humans are naturally racist, and children in particular are still ruled to a large degree by their subconcious behavioural predispositions (i.e slight racial favouritism).
And lets say humans (and indeed all social animals) are very good at subconciously detecting how broadly related someone is to them (ever found people of mixed race sexually attractive, but felt not much attraction towards people fully of other races, what's up with that?).- in fact, some argue this ability is vital for kin alruism to work properly.

And lets say white kids subconciously give more favouritism towards kids who are more related to them (i.e other white kids) and give less favouritism towards kids the least related to them the least (i.e full black, with mixed race in between).
And lets say black kids are more subconciously drawn towards kids who share more genes with them (i.e black kids), with more mixed kids more inbetween (simple evolutionary psychology really).

>and huzzah!

Instant [impossible to control for] environmental explaination for the black-white iq discrepancy in adoption studies (including when mixed-race kids do better than black kids despite being told they are fully black).

Stormfags, U MAD?

Lets say the predominant black culture is largely anti-intellectual.
And lets say humans are naturally racist, and children in particular are still ruled to a large degree by their subconcious behavioural predispositions (i.e slight racial favouritism).
And lets say humans (and indeed all social animals) are very good at subconciously detecting how broadly related someone is to them (ever found mixed race women attractive, but not women of other races, what's up with that?).

And lets say white kids subconciously give more favouritism towards kids who are more related to them (i.e other white kids) and give less favouritism towards kids the least related to them the least (i.e full black, with mixed race in between).
And lets say black kids are more subconciously drawn towards kids who share more genes with them (i.e black kids), with more mixed kids more inbetween (simple evolutionary psychology really).

>and huzzah!

Instant [impossible to control for] environmental explaination for the black-white iq discrepancy in adoption studies (including when mixed-race kids do better than black kids despite being told they are fully black).

Stormfags, U MAD?