/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15502132
No, that's false.
> Openness personality. Humanities and broad interests overlap with a personality that is of divergent thinking. It accepts as many hypotheses as possible as true or plausible. However, this isn't how science operates. Science doesn't care about scope, it cares about veracity, accuracy, and exactness. As such it narrows down to as few hypotheses as possible and rejects the rest, which is actually a good thing, as that separates the wheat from the chaff. Humanities on the other hand don't separate the wheat from the chaff because they're disciplines fundamentally concerned with speculation, not exact truth per se. Soft sciences stay soft because to stop being soft they'd have to stop speculation, and humanities faculties are fundamentally institutes of speculation
/x/ is full of superstitious people (higher Openness than IQ). Ultimately Openness is where the juice is at, it's where all the interesting hypotheses are. However, most of them are wrong and stupid.
This is why Hermetic tradition far outmogs any 20th century or other contemporary occultism. Occultism is what low IQ roasties on crystalcafe engage in. If you want true gnosis you must go back to the roots. Unveil Zoroastrian, kike, and especially neokike(Christian) propaganda, book-burning and suppression of Openness and go to the alchemical meat of things. If you're afraid of going batshit, just consider it from the POV of Carl Jung. Carl Jung is the wisdom about these traditions. (here I define wisdom as the capacity of making the distinction between appearance and reality)

Here is a list of some of the relevant traditions:
neoplatonism
hermeticism
gnosticism
sufism
kabbalah
taoism
crow way
zen buddhism
hinduism
the dreaming of australian aboriginal

Here is a list of what you should avoid:
anything post 18th century, like laveyan satanism,
anything christian or otherwise monotheistic
kybalion
blavatsky
gurdijeff

(bscly anything roasties engage in or is mainstream)