/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3200938
>neither did tower 7 and it still collapsed due to fire

Yea just fire. Giant chunks of debris from the falling towers didnt cause massive structural damage- oh wait, it did, faggot. This is the number one lie "truthers"(god thats some good irony) like to bring up about building 7.

>>3180754
That side is facing away from the towers. The other side was mostly inaccessible at the time and covered in billowing smoke anyway.

Here is a shot of the corner of the side facing the towers, and that is not even the center of the building where most of the wreckage hit. The fire burning in the first picture is in other words burning at the opposite side of the impact, meaning it was quite wide spread.

never forget the damage on the south side of the building.

This is the picture truthers dont want you to see, Since it proves the lie about WTC7 only having "a few small fires". The pictures they like to parade around are on the side of the building that didnt have debris fall on it.
>>2445834 case in point

Tell me, when you kick out 1 leg of a 4 legged table what happens? Sure it can actually stand on 3 legs for a good bit, but it will be unstable as fuck and given time, fall. Fuck watch the video of it coming down, IT FUCKING STARTS IN 1 CORNER. THIS CORNER.

The only conspiracy here is how the truthers pretend to be interested in truth when its quite the opposite. They are nothing but anarchists spreading lies, disinformation and anti government propaganda.

>>2248325
I dont understand whats so hard to understand about WTC7.
>>2242592
pic related to this diagram.

Tell me again how WTC7 wasnt structurally compromised.

>>1759835
Pay no attention to the whole South-west corner being destroyed...

Here's the corner that was more severely damaged.