/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14741418
>Which predictions haven't come true? You said it was "debunked." How?
The water stress alone is false since both water consumption and water storage has increased since 2 decades ago

>I responded to your claim that the future is nowhere near the past.
And you haven't even refuted it once.

>Similar rates of warming in the past also coincide with mass extinctions. Do you agree or disagree?
I've already made my point here>>14740086
and yet like an obvious retard you continue to ignore it. Mass extinction have existed as long as modern humanities exist as proven by the same articles you've just linked. And yet humanity continued to evolve and survived.

>Do you actually think Neanderthals or homo sapiens lived 90 million years ago
I might've made a mistake on the period of global temperatures but nonetheless, this >>14740016
also prove my point

>Right, the fact that there was no similar warming
>no similar warming
Of course there's no similar warming because the fucking past is much worse than that
>>14740016
That is a not an insignificant change and what do you know, humans survived well before and after that period

>Your own graphs are sufficient evidence.
>lol no u
typical

>Of what?
That humanity will survive. And again I accept your concession

>What relevant part have I ignored? Use your words like a big boy.
Are you THAT retarded. I've already presented it to you countless of times. The fact that you won't accept it doesn't it's not true.

>It's evidently true that current warming is much faster than anything humans
Yeah and it coincide and correlates greatly with human growth and technological advancement since we made significant use of high CO2 emission fuel
https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/us-energy-facts/
It's not going to change much for the foreseeable future

>See >>14740843
lol here we go
>>14740924