/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12327447
>Non of those things matter
And you assert this on what basis? A priori notions, that's what your basis is. You don't think you need to engage with the literature or gather empirical data, little narcissist thinks he simply knows it all at the outset. Man, why do we bother with experiment when we could jsut save a lot of time and money, and just ask you?

Read a book, kiddo.

>We are able to do some correlation with brainwaves but the output is trash
Topic is too broad. Many methods of remote pickup were developed decades ago (implants, nanotech, interference (see patents) + autocorrelator), and remote sensing and biometrics is a rapidly advancing field present day. It really depends on what you're looking measure, and what you intend to do with that metric.

>Basically kill yourself. OD on your lithium.
lol, u mad bro? Pathetic. And you actually seem think anyone would think you're worth the time.

>>12163099

>>12059302
Reminder that bluetooth causes brain damage and will also cripple your thyroid.

Cholinergic and opioid system effects.

>>12024726
Turn it off, anon. Just say no.

>>12023387
>heats
There's your problem. Enjoy the journey.

>>11730370
They'll be brain damaged, sterile, and they'll have various developmental and hormonal disorders. This has been studied. We have research on this going back long before wifi even existed. They're basically weapons.

It's part of our version of Brave New World. You need to initially halt population growth before you control it, and control who breeds, etc.

>>11677164
A sizeable amount of literature has shown microwaves are likely physically addictive.

Hm.. and I wonder... if...

>>11476225
(Occurs as well and sometimes more at lower power densities, nonlinear dose response)