/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11264886
Where does this association come from? For each subfield, Math StackExchange tends to have a a few core posters who's word is taken as gospel and their opinions appear to be rather streamlined. It is (or was) different with physics and philosphy, where discourse was often quite influenced by exotic folks like Ron Maimon and other complicated characters. On math you got your logic Prof and your functional analysis postdoc and they usually give you the perspective you could have guessed.

>>11264895
I've never used reddit, is there actually a good math page?

>>11264870
But where-else would you play around with fantasy objects then?
Besides, while I understand your sentiment, I'm not certain if you mean what you say. There's probably no way around non-computability if you don't literally want to give up on Turing complete systems. And I think as soon you have one, you got them in your number system.

Also just stumbled upon this text, which seems super nice
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.05495.pdf

I think I'll write down a rant on weaker principles like REM's and LPO's, i.e.
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/principle+of+omniscience
it's an interesting topic.