/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11174302
Just show G satisfies the following
1) closed: any z=x*y is in G
2) associativity: (x*y)*z=x*(y*z)
3) has an identity element: there exists an E in G such that x*E=x
4) inveritibitliy: for any x in G there is an x' so that x*x'=E
5) commutativity (this makes it abelian): x*y=y*z

Hint: all of these can be proven trivially since R itself is a field

>Lol.

>>11128420
Based

>>11096648
>search results: 0
fuck me 10/10

>search results: 0
fuck me 10/10

>>11068115
>dude use physics to predict what happens in a non-physical scenario
>>11068115
You do realize that B also violates conservation of momentum, right?
Initial momentum
Pi=(mass man)(105 kmh)+(mass train)(100 kmh)
After he walks through, assuming B
Pf=(mass man)(5 kmh)+(mass train)(100 kmh)<Pi

Portals do not conserve momentum. They also violate causality. Both options are equally nonsense.

>>11043424
>This is me. Literally me. No other character can come close to relating to me like this. There is no way you can convince me this is not me. This character could not possibly be anymore me. It's me, and nobody can convince me otherwise. If anyone approached me on the topic of this not possibly being me, then I immediately shut them down with overwhelming evidence that this character is me. This character is me, it is indisputable. Why anyone would try to argue that this character is not me is beyond me. If you held two pictures of me and this character side by side, you'd see no difference. I can safely look at this character every day and say "Yup, that's me". I can practically see this character every time I look at myself in the mirror. I go outside and people stop me to comment how similar I look and act to this character. I chuckle softly as I'm assured everyday this character is me in every way. I can smile each time I get out of bed every morning knowing that I've found my identity with this character and I know my place in this world. It's really quite funny how similar this character is to me, it's almost like we're identical twins. When I first saw this character, I had an existential crisis. What if this character was the real me and I was the fictional being. What if this character actual became aware of my existence? Did this character have the ability to become self aware itself?

>>11027356
Rude!

[eqn]A=\frac{R^2(\sqrt{2}-1)^2}{2}[\eqn]
Where R is radius of curvature

>>10982049
No, transwomen are either bottoms who take it too seriously or pervy straight males who have issues with their own identity.

>>10975337
>>10975350
>>10975507
>le samefag

>>10905107
***[math]\exp(j\theta)=\cos(\theta)+j\sin(\theta[/math]
ftfy

>>10861114
Unambiguously 1.5 kg, assuming the scale has not been zeroed
>>10864015
Nice b8

>>10861114
Unambiguously 1.5 kg

>>10818518
Imagine being this guy

>>10800976
>anime
>liberal=left-wing

>>10737308
You play guitar or anything? Think about a chord. A chord is composed of multiple notes (each of which are composed of multiple frequencies), but if you strum a chord out you get a define location in time and indefinite tone. If instead you pluck an arpeggio, you get distinct notes spread across a more vague section of time. Is is the i tuition behind uncertainty. Btw, the image you posted captures it pretty well. Just stare at it a while.

>discord

>>10576587
>Waiting costs money
Not even close to millions.
>Do you know how much it costs to run super computers?
Nobody is using supercomputers to calculate pi or find primes.
>Why else would I be replying to a retard
Because you are bored with life and hellbent on proving some gay form of mysticism. Tip: you haven't actually provided any evidence that there is anything mysterious or magical or otherwise interesting about the digits of pi.

Correct me if I am wrong. Your argument is: because we spend loads of money calculating pi or finding primes or whatever (which we don't), then there must be something occultic going on.

>back hole outrage thread #247
Have sex

This thread sure is berserkerfag.
>hurr durr ur just describing a thing not explaining deeper cause
>dude light and gravity dun exist even though we directly observe them
>magnetism totally real though, for arbitrary reasons

>subtle "why can't I build muscle" thread

>>10480838
No. Marxism is anti-scientific.

>>10443172
You don't. At best hope for bi tendencies.