/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15752420
NTA, it's self-evident because you can directly observe it you numb skull.
Do I need some scientific theory to approve my observation that an apple is red or that sky is blue as well or are they self-evident though direct perception?
This entire excerise in brute materialistic reductionism is retarded; instead of coming up with better theories to accomodate all observable facts you opt to disregard certain observable facts because they don't fit into your current theoretical framework.
The blant irony is when it comes to consciousness materialists becomes wholly unscientific.

>not doing math entirely in your head

graph theory

>>4067278
impoverished scum detected.

Why does my government waste my money on studying a storm that's happening in Saturn while a lot of people are starving?

Well I've never been so offended.

>>2472001
>project self onto other people so I don't feel bad about being such a pathetic loser.
Please get out.

>>2353778
that kind of pessimism doesn't suit someone that reads science fiction.

>>1637435

What the fuck do you think a "bit" is?

>>1528181

Now you're just trying far too hard, dear chap.

>>1326096

query: the international scene/economics, zero sum game (the amount of happiness is fixed, for one to win, another must lose), positive sum game (all parties can win, or at least some parties don't need to lose) or negative sum game (it's a competition to see who loses the least)