/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7962369
His thoughts and works are still usefull man, I know we can't actually ground math 100% in pure logic but he is still worth studying.

>Logic is an incredibly minor sect of it. 95% of philosophers do not study logic. They are familiar with it's methods, but they don't study logic. You're making a categorical error.
Have you never openend even seen what kind of classes do phil majors have? Phil majors study fucktons of logic man.

>hur de hur de hur
>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/philosophy-mathematics/
Do you even read the links you copy-paste? The incompleteness theorems are mentioned there.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/
Of course philosophy of math uses maths, the incompleteness theorems are both philosophy of math and math itself.

It's used as a structure of analytic philosophy, but isn't the subject of any philosophy. But all people use logic all of the time, it's just autistic when analytic philosophy tries to do it.

>It's used as a structure of analytic philosophy, but isn't the subject of any philosophy. But all people use logic all of the time, it's just autistic when analytic philosophy tries to do it.
Hurrr
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-pluralism/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-modal/