[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.6090327 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Pauli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6090327

Momentum and energy missing in your decay reactions?

Create a new particle to account for it!

>> No.5368521 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5368521

Why is Einstein often considered to be the face of genius when this man was much more brilliant? Is it because Einstein was a jew?

>> No.3277195 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3277195

>>3277179
Why is it so hard to believe that I would want to conduct a time travel experiment?

>> No.3148919 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3148919

>>3148735
Sorry bro, but your model/ideas are not consistant with anything we have ever observed.
It is in no way similar to the model we use for the expansion of space or any model we use for ANYTHING!

GR with the FLRW metric is 4-d (3 spatial, 1 temporal), it works pretty fucking well, and explains and predicts most cosmological phenomina.

Why are you introducing all these extra dimensions? What is the point? What does it accomplish? 4d is all we need.

I'm sure its a neat idea, but that is all it is. And there are hundreds of similar neat ideas out there. No one pays much attention to them, cause they are a fucking waste of time (until they actually produce some results!)

I imagine you got such nonsense from Pop-science. A lot of times pop-science will show all these fucking useless "fringe theories" and pass them off as "standard science".

>> No.3004535 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3004535

>>3004448
You don't know what metaphysics is do you?

I am not talking about metaphysics. I am talking about actual physics, that actual works very very very very very very very very well. Quantum field theory is the most sucessful scientific theory ever made. It has unsurpassed predictive and explanitory power.

You can actually use it, and apply it to the cat in the box. You will find that the idea of the Cat being dead and alive, ends up becoming fucking laughable.

>> No.2265140 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2265140

>>2265101
Good question

>Do photons annihilate each other?

Yes they can

>And would a new photon with the combined energy of both previous photons be created in the process?

All sorts of crazy shit could happen, including new photons, or simply the reverse of electron-positron annihilation. Hence you could get two photons to annihilate and become an electron and a positron.

>Does this actually occur

Happens all the time

>> No.2176706 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2176706

So Batman saves Rachel at Harvey dents partry, but then it cuts to a completely new scene.

We never know what happened to the Joker in Wayne's Mansion, who was still trying to find Harvey Dent. WTF HAPPENED?

>> No.1916274 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1916274

Wolfgang Pauli


his dad gave up on Judaism and converted to Catholicism

>> No.1896552 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1896552

Fermions are the niggers of particle physics. Goddamn anti-symmetrical wave functions keep them excluded. Fuck, I'm high.

>> No.1875006 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1875006

>>1874995
"I really have nothing against the homosexual, but I still would not hire an engineer"

W.Pauli

>> No.1467858 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1467858

>>1467842
I was unable to recognize Einstein whenever you talked about him in either your letter or your manuscript. It seemed to me as if you had erected some dummy Einstein for yourself, which you then knocked down with great pomp. In particular Einstein does not consider the concept of `determinism' to be as fundamental as it is frequently held to be (as he told me emphatically many times) ... he disputes that he uses as a criterion for the admissibility of a theory the question "Is it rigorously deterministic?"... he was not at all annoyed with you, but only said that you were a person who will not listen

>> No.1410784 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1410784

>>1410756
"Engineers? Fuck'em" - W.Pauli

>> No.1242935 [View]
File: 42 KB, 421x600, Wolfgang_Pauli_ETH-Bib_Portr_01042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1242935

>>1242854
"Engineers? Fuck-em" - W. Pauli

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]