/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10751924

>>10751896
>Those results are consistent with the 97% consensus reported by Cook et al.
This is a circle jerk of self referential bullshit. Cook isn't even a scientist and only went back to get a degree in psychology after his climate crusade. He copied the work of another hack and all these hacks point to each others work as to why their bullshit must be correct.

>>10703922
They won't listen to PragerU but will listen to a college dropout and political cartoonist from Brisbane who pretends to be a scientist.
If you confirm their bias -> low standard required
Go against their bias -> nobody can attain the level of credentials required.

>>10265119
Your arguing to conduct "science" by memes. The "consensus meme" was the work of little shits like pic related.

>>8867022