/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9965769
fucking godfags can't even understand the transitivity of equivalence classes, kek

>>9907558
that name still gets me

>>9862122
>without water you'd be a shriveled up raisin-man
>stop complaining about drowning!

>>9848917
medicine still has a bit of low hanging fruit. biotech is going to be the next big boom. cyberpunk dystopia soon.

hey everyone, you reading OP's posts? thats what job security looks like.

>take out a 40-60k loan for a car, a depreciating asset that will continue to eat money, at a hefty interest rate.
>its perfectly normal and nobody complains

>take out a 40-60k loan for an asset that is statistically proven to increase lifetime earnings and quality of life at a government subsidized interest rate.
>OMG WHAT A RIP!

sorry you can't just fuck off in college and burn 4 more years figuring out what you want to do with your life on someone elses dime. if you wanted to do that you should've joined the military.

>>9778856
its just a bunch of shitters complaining about how they can't get good.

>>9746369
>it ain't 93 million miles away it's obvious.
Not An Argument
>I can't believe
well if YOU can't believe it, cased closed! surely nothing in the universe could defy your understanding!
>Get a clear, direct line of sight or it's worthless.
Why? Because (You) said so. What's with the constant goalpost-shifting? Every time someone posts the evidence you demand, you come up with some reason it doesn't count. (Also, the video you posted has a bunch of clouds in front of the sun. Hypocrisy much?)
>Something that blocks the sun's light creating day and night.
The atmosphere scatters light, redirecting it and creating a diffuse glow even when the source of the light isn't directly visible. Don't believe me? Go outside near a big city at night and see how the atmosphere scatters its lights. (Lest you think the light is from the sun or moon, notice that city sky-glow is MORE pronounced on cloudy nights.)
>Don't you know the the horizon line will always be at eye level.
Looking out the window of a skyscraper easily shows this to be false.

You'll notice I've given you some simple experiments you can do to verify my claims. Naturally, you'll refuse to even attempt them, because (as has been stated before) flatheads aren't interested in evidence, because it inevitably proves them wrong.

how'd you do on your IQ test?

>>9486480
You are unfamiliar with the issue at hand and swallow modern propaganda like a fat man swallows cake. The non-brainlets here accept that the underlying joke in all of this is that this can all be explained by differing average IQs among the races.

Additionally, don't you find it strange that there would be an implicit bias, like the one in the study you linked, if humans weren't naturally 'racist'? Western society has demonized the term 'racism,' and yet here we are, dealing with 'racism' all the way down to the pre-school level. It's almost as if this is an innate trait of homo sapiens. Not that I'd expect a brainlet like you to comprehend that, though.

these threads are great. reminds me why i bill at $200 an hour LMAO. waiting for the "i got an engineering degree but can't get a job" faggots to show up.

>>9158435
>in engineering, understanding basic physics is NOT enough to build a working structure
good thing you don't understand basic physics then.
>So having a static analysis is simply not enough for even the most basic things (bridge), then why is it enough to describe the climate of earth?
what makes you think that whole-planet climate models are static? given the complexity of the feedbacks involved, why would climatologists ever do such a thing?

>The causal chain human CO2 emission -> climate change -> hurricane formation is simply not explained by ANY mathematic model at all, at least non that I am aware of.
okay, which of the following facts are you contesting?

>1. Human activity has caused the pCO2 of the atmosphere to increase.
>2. CO2 acts as a greenhouse gas, causing a significant elevation of Earth's surface temperature.
>3. Surface temperatures of tropical waters are positively correlated with globally averaged surface temperature.
>4. Hurricane strength is positively correlated with surface temperatures of the water over which it forms.

because if all 4 of those are true, human activity has caused an increase in the severity of hurricanes.

>>9149094
oh i know it does. its how i know the guys whinging about "muh jobs" are the cardboard league shitters.

>be in junior year
>friend is bitching about not getting an internship
>ask him how many applications he filled out
>"oh man, so fuckin' many. like easily 20."
>mfw

>>9091127
Element of plasma

>>9070910
>So no one knows what EEs actually do at their jobs?

lemme break it down for you.

>come in to work
>get some coffee
>read emails
>make a few phone calls
>have a meeting
>few more emails
>write a report
>go check the status of the mcguffin
>shitpost/browse the internet
>go home

you will maybe do "engineering" like once a week. this isn't some piss ant engineering gig either, this is what guys making six figures at fortune 500 companies are doing all day.

>>8993634
>that whale's leg bones are probably a good adaptation for processing echolocational data.
>>8993662
>But more to the point, the bones wouldn't have to be connected to anything in order to receive sound. I think innervation is enough?
Except that whales' hip and leg bones aren't connected to the auditory cortex. You're inventing out of thin air this idea that there are auditory organs in whale hips, a claim directly contradicted by anatomical study of whale cadavers and unsupported by any principle of acoustics.

This is what creationists do; when evidence shows up that they can't explain, they simply lie about it.

>>8934826
>Radar seeing air currents