/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12307370
This.
I'll make one ~3 months from now to test the waters.

>>11692821
>down there
He's not a monkey, lad.
However, I'm also very curious.

>>11678324
Blessed and humblepilled.
>>11678345
>indecies
The plural of index is indices, anon.

>>11532520
How should I know?

>>11320941
>how do I prove it
What have you tried?
Actually, have you even tried anything? Surely you've at least plugged in the definition and checked.

>>11020879
>then you BTFO row two with a based and redpilled multiple of row one
>>11020893
Back in the day, a professor of mine would explain stuff like "and then the singularity goes kaboom shlubgrubla and then we've resolved it".
I thought he was autistic, but the rest of the class seemed to have some honest laughter.
How autistic is the class you're teaching?

>>10731930
There are canonical ways of slicing objects such that the areas of the cross sections are invariant under symplectomorphism. Emphasis on "area" of the cross section, not n-1 dimensional volume.
If that makes no sense to you, think really, really hard about the non-squeezing theorem.
>>10732123
Yes.

>>10276073
>assume the functions exist
>>10276075
No, that's true.

>>10229486
Second fella here.
Literally defines a product as a map from SxS to S, that by itself makes it closed (check by yourself).