/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15538876
>nevermind that 0.1% of kids straight up die from it then

please elaborate further on this meme.
Do the kids die because of measels, or because measels get misdiagnosed, and it is actually a indistinguishable similar diseases like idopathic thrombocytopenia with purpora or a aspirin allergy, which is indistinguishable from measels...

>>15417035
>infection
The ethymology original meaning, means contamination.

>But measles was still making kids sterile in the 50s
WAs it?
Or was it the standard of care, which included giving children antimony and calomel, and ether and heroin?

Since the dawn of time, they poisoned people as treatment.
And then they stopped this treatment and exchanged it with a lesser poison.
And magically the fatality and morbidity decreased.

Not only the treatment but also the diagnosis.
They could not even distinguish "skin diseases" nor did they knew about aspirin allergies which lead to the same skin effect.
Everything on the skin was measels.
And they pretended to know it is a specific disease, when it could have been thrombozytopenia with purpura, and applying the wrong treatment caused a worse outcome if it was "diagnosed" as measels.
Doctors are sharlatans with a license to kill you via guesswork.

>>15314954
>Also, measles is different from mumps, but it looks similar to smallpox and syphillis (besides rubella and scarlatina).

In the early days, there was for example no way to distingish:
thrombocytopenia purpura from measels.
Visually they are indistinguishable.

Not only that. But mumps, scarlet fever, erythrema and the allergic reaction to aspirin, which was dispensed in the early 1900s like candy.

Picrel.