/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15911862
>to me it seems obvious.
That's like saying five pictures of the pool table prove you really pulled off an amazing trick shot. If you're not predisposed to believe it's true the argument, on its own, is shit.
Evolution isn't true because of one single central piece of evidence you can argue for in five minutes that's able to convince even the most confident flat earther, evolution has loads and loads and loads of evidence. It takes time.
>>15912131
>I didn't believe in evolution either and now I'm starting to open my eyes about this whole branch of science.
Are you actually twelve?

>>11238986
>literally the Haruhi problem

>>11207665
>tfw no grad-student girlfriend to tutor me while I pretend not to understand the subject
I understand those five undergrad boys, they have my sympathies.
>>11207623
Polya's Problems and Theorems in Analysis.
Otherwise, see the sticky for recs.

>>11176208
>every single anon who attempted to answer this question is retarded and unable to read
>you can't just make a simple formula were both addition and multiplication differences coexist, making a formula for this would be as hard as make a formula for the factorial sequence
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1997996/formula-for-finite-power-series
>>11176235
You can, yes.

>>10656974
Reminder commutatives burn in hell.

How do I force myself to read babby texts after getting used to grad texts?

>>10283249

>>10262768
Oeconomics for faggots.
This post was made by chrematistics gang.

>>10234309
>he posts "justify yourself" bait