[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10567712 [View]
File: 137 KB, 742x722, 1555469530873.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10567712

>>10567090

>> No.10564972 [View]
File: 137 KB, 742x722, 55e802e75f42a95adff9403d94fa576e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10564972

>>10564019
Whoa, you're going to be labelled as an anti-vaxxer for questioning big pharma there.

>Be Yale
>Invite RFK Jr to debate vaccines
>Laugh with colleagues because it's 5 on 1
>Assume he'll drop out
>Day before debate, nothing
>Phone rings
>It's RFK
>He's on the plane to us
>"We still doing this?"
>Full panic mode
>All 5 cancel
>It's now just RFK on stage alone
>All 5 of us hiding in a broom closet
>Somehow still think the science is on our side

>> No.10549605 [View]
File: 137 KB, 742x722, 55e802e75f42a95adff9403d94fa576e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10549605

>>10549598
That law will get shut down just as easily.
Especially after the other one got shut down literally less than a week prior.
>that will never happen because all the ''experts'' support us
Wrong. You guys cant even stand up to RFK jr. Anytime you're forced to publicly address an issue or hard science, your experts "cancel".

>> No.10521898 [View]
File: 137 KB, 742x722, 55e802e75f42a95adff9403d94fa576e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10521898

This is RFK jrs response.

This is an important scientific and medical discussion that needs to happen. So why is it not currently happening even when the experts agree to speak to the people concerned. This man does not bring up a single piece of anecdotal evidence or appeals of emotion, he brings only science and facts.

>> No.10516022 [View]
File: 137 KB, 742x722, 55e802e75f42a95adff9403d94fa576e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10516022

>>10516002
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22
>No vaccinemanufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.

It's funny, you would think that the side of science would be very vocal and ready to disprove any claims made by the opposing side, yet every time there is a discussion or somebody hosts an event or even attempts to get a debate going, the pro-vaxx side seems to cancel and threaten every doctor in the country to not speak.
Now what kind of science has to threaten their own doctors to not defend their product?
part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9bVeEwyxXk&t=14s
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61MjmbELI84&t=2s
Back story of the host of the event and emails of those who cancelled: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmLDOymb4YA

And here is YALE UNIVERSITY cancelling at the last minute on RFK jr. They cancelled 4 of their experts on the subject in a discussion when they were only against 1 single man who isn't even medically trained.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Yf4-P2qbHo

And they want to have the audacity to say "Why are anti-vaxxers growing? Why are people vaccine hesitant?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIiz54ecS_4

This is a regular mother respecting dr hotez and asking for real discussion, saying she praises his work and all she wants it to talk about the science. His response?
>You're functioning as useful idiots
An ad-hominem towards a concerned parent. But thats just one case right? He is just a shitty person.

How about in this discussion
https://youtu.be/MEmVLzhYmYY
Oh look, instead of actually discussion the science JB handley brings fourth, he relies on appeals of emotion. Where is the debate and science?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]