/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11268380
>Yeah, I don't waste time conversing with chat bots. The algorithm is super weak.
Wow, it's like you feel exactly the way I do only you're all programmed to use circular logic when it comes to space. Just show me some evidence and I won't have to keep asking!

>>11268368
I never made the claim space exists. Other people have and I simply asked for proof. But people insist on not doing that and pud pulling me all the way. Why? Just answer.

>>11268360
>Oranges exist
>I have an orange
>many people can have an orange
>you can see an orange
>you can test an orange
>even if you define "it" as something other than an "orange" "it" is still empirical. "It" has not inherently changed even though you defined it as...oh lets say an "apple".
>Okay, fine. The redescribed things now refereed to as "apple" is still there, being empirical.

So here's what you could do.

Do:
Prove to me that "space" exists as something that does something, like the orange/apple.
Re-describe over and over what "space" can be defined as, so long as you actually have tested it and proven that it is indeed an "it" of some sort.

Do not:
Re-describe "space" over and over constantly thinking that JUST re-describing what was never proven to empirically exist actually makes it exists.

>>11268355
re read this:
>>11267850

>>9506334

>>9089955

Putting your trebuchets almost up against the enemies walls

>>8981985

>'I don't program' as an option

>There are people ITT that take "gravity doesn't exist :((((" posts seriously with serious responses

The ease of baiting someone is incredible. The fact that anyone would even waste their time with gravity deniers is laughable.

>writing on graph paper instead of lined paper

>>7001268
>not being taught concepts of mean, median, and mode
>highschoolfag detected